power

The very revealing idiot lingo of warmism

Language shapes thought and thought shapes language.

Style of language is a reflection of intellect.

Sometimes simplifications are made for practicality, but often for mental convenience, and according to the principle mentioned, it serves to further dumb down the thought behind it.

And a lot of very telling idiot lingo can be found in the bigoted ‘warmism’ (here an example of practical simplification) agenda.

There is the “climate change denier” that implies the ideological enemies refuse to accept that climate change is a thing even though it is an inherent property of the climate to be always-changing. That is part of nature, of the dynamic, living system. And this of course also ties into the rhetorical switcharoo where “global warming” turned into “climate change” so that it becomes universally applicable to any type of change and thus has potential to be perpetuated indefinitely as well as allows to lump opposite phenomena into the same agenda. The core claim of warming effects has not changed.

Then there is the cringy shortening which already expressed quite clearly the dumbing down of the intellect: “climate denier”. A term that implies there are people who deny that climate even exists. “Climate” becomes the indiscriminate label and anyone who objects to anything carrying that label can be called a denier.

Then there is maybe the term most telling about the core problem behind the whole agenda: “harmful to the climate”. This is nonsensical because the climate is a concept, a measurement, a description of overall weather states on a large timescale. By definition you cannot harm the climate because whatever it is is what it is supposed to be. It cannot end. But when bigots use the term “climate denier”, you can see how that line of thought could be entertained by them. Like ‘they want to kill the climate’.

This is almost suitable as a koan: “What would the world be without climate?”

What is actually meant with all that idiot lingo but which warmists rarely want to talk about is something that ties into documented spreading trends of mental afflictions that take great issue and experience distress with change.
But even if we don’t want to examine it as such a clear-cut pathology, the psychology behind it is fear of change. Because of a general awareness and experience of this world’s societies overall running like crap, being under capitalist scarcity torment, people have no confidence that such a system can handle changes well without many people suffering and dying. And thus the mind goes into an extreme state, arbitrarily and self-servingly chooses the ‘current’ climate that our current crappy system is built on and managing, what we have grown accustomed to as ideal based on own preference and what we know, as the ‘healthy’ state of climate that needs to be preserved because it is ‘normal’. Of course then any weather extreme, whether hot or cold, will be condemned as abnormal and caused by that devil CO2. (And BTW, since CO2 is a typical product of industrial activity, it is of course irresistible for the politically green to demonize.)

I have even seen a weather ‘expert’ on TV talk about many areas where the weather this year has been “too cold” or “too hot”. In the same breath. It was simply all relativized to agriculture and with the climate label slapped on it and thereby, ironically, capitalist dictates defined climate policy. If only that wicked ‘excess’ CO2 wasn’t causing a mess everywhere, then there would be no dry summers or wet summers but only just-right summers. ‘Healthy’, ‘normal’ summers.

The warmism ideology actually furthers a crippling of our ability to improve the situation because it is waging war on change, which is nature. It is like the tree that gets uprooted in a storm while the leaves of grass bend gracefully and thereby prevail. And with that mentality it is iconically fascist-totalitarian. Only one rigid state of things tolerated and enforced.
If you removed all human CO2 generation and didn’t tell them, they would still panic over the end of the world, purely based on natural weather fluctuations.

Like so many crazy ideologies emerging from the USA’s society due to a profound problem at its root, this one is lusting for world domination and could never tolerate becoming obsolete. Just like capitalism.
And then it also makes perfect sense to see Extinction Rebellion jump on board with their supposed enemies, US-corporate-imperialists, and promote their propaganda lies against a socialist country (Bolivia), simply because it feeds into their eco-do-gooder image campaign that furthers their power. – Because it is all a power trip, multi-faceted, because by misanthropically condemning humankind’s actions, we are telling us what great power we have. And the more powerful the opponent, the more powerful oneself has to be, which is a wonderful justification for just about any deed committed in pursuit of it.

Capitalism IS what people describe as corruption. It is the iconic ideology of fear. And fear makes stupid. And stupidity leads to people acting against their own best interest for the profit of a few manipulators. It bribes with short-term profits for all, which is especially tempting for people of weak virtue in a state of existential worry.
Anyone and anything can be corrupted when fear is allowed to determine the course of actions. When the root motivation isn’t pure, when there isn’t constant humble devotion towards work to keep it pure. It has to be a constant function, integrated into the character. If you try to find a shortcut, that already is corruption, too.

Love lives abundance. First in the mind, then through action on the outside.
Corporate fascism and eco-fascism are a powerful team of Master Fear, because both see the salvation in preaching scarcity. Both glorify ever-greater efficiency of processes, i.e. managing a perceived/created state of not having enough.
You could say, this form of environmentalism is capitalism’s progressive youth movement. It is about as distant from true environmentalism as Bernie Sanders is from socialism. (But this point is another story about perpetuation of what the USA have always been.)

How marketing learns from imperalists

Doom, Doom 2, … Doom 3, … Doom. Oh no! You, too, id?!

id Software teamed up with Bethesda as publisher. One of the big ones. Those who all follow the same idiotic marketing bullshit (actually worrisome, more on that in a minute).

They talk about rebooting the series, which is almost double-bullshit in one short sentence. Doom has never been a real series. There were two quite similar games long time ago and then much later a creepy, jumpscare-themed graphics orgy, relatively different from the original material. And then, now, much later again, we get … “Doom”.

You know why this bothers me so much? Not just because it is becoming very popular, but because the mindsets that drive such marketing ideas are the same that you can find in politics. When you “reboot” a series so that you can exploit a popular name for doing things as you please, different than before, this is very similar to how empires erase culture and history (e.g. by burning books) in order to establish their ways as the beginning of everything, without disturbance from what came before.

Remember the double middle finger case of a confessing Star Wars fan directing a ‘reboot’ of Star Trek that ended up being like a Lost in Space quality Star Wars style lens flare festival?

Tomb Raider is another example of such naming crap. (‘I mean Tomb Raider, not Tomb Raider.’)

These things are being done so much because it’s an agenda. Marketing optimizes, changes, attempts to reprogram people. And when you want to fully control the present, you have to erase the past from people’s minds. That’s really oldschool imperialist insights. Basically, when people talk about Doom, the marketeers want everybody to think of their new product, not the original game … or a super-capitalist future.
Leaving franchises alone instead of dissing them? You can’t expect that from marketeers. That would imply respect.

I won’t hide how much I agree with Bill Hicks’ view on the matter:

UPDATE: Search “Bill Hicks – Advertising and Marketing” on Youtube. It seems if I directly link it here, it will trigger content ID claims. (Either that or coincidence.)

P.S.: Don’t accuse me of doomsaying. It’s marketing that spelled Doom.

Beware of imagined people-power

There’s that saying that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
Well, with all the activism growing in the world, of the people’s voice being heard and all that, a new challenge arises.

Because those movements are challenging powerful interest groups, those groups will try various approaches for securing their power. And one really clever method that is likely applied from the very top is along the lines of the saying:

The most hopelessly enslaved are those who falsely believe to be free.

What I call “worldsaving bread&circuses” would be one example of this, and another one could be, and I will mention it for elaboration of my point:

Net neutrality.

I read an article about it, talking about it being likely to be preserved in the USA, and the article itself, unaware of its implications, contained some warning signs: It mentioned that net neutrality has the support of president Obama, some democratic allies in politics as well as various big telecommunications corporations. So apparently there are some in the business who believe that, after weighing possible pros and cons, net neutrality is their preferrable way.

So if net neutrality ends up being preserved … How do we know the popular activism had any say in that?
Tricky one, isn’t it? All you can do is believe it did, unless you have damn well documented every chain of cause and effect. A decision being made that happens to match the preferences of the people isn’t evidence of causation.

Studies have been made about US politics that draw a picture of the people ultimately having virtually no say at all on what decisions are being made, so that’s certainly cause for heightened vigilance and scrutiny.

This is an urge for more activism, but not the blind kind. You gotta be smart and not hastily jump on any feeling of triumph or power. It is a character weakness based in your ego that will be exploited in order to deceive you. Just like people’s lack of purpose in life and falling-out with traditional religion made them vulnerable to aforementioned tales of being heroes and saviors in the context of the modern armageddon prophecy of global warming. Too many people put more importance on believing they are making a difference than on knowing for sure they actually do. It’s egoistical, really. Personal convenience. Soothing your conscience. Selling of indulgences. And when your self-deception is challenged, you will condemn those who actually care about the result as pessimists or call them much worse, revealing that the whole time you’ve really just cared about yourself.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but you can be an activist for social justice and still be a mere pawn of big business, in ignorance or outright denial of the massive human suffering you might be causing.